Teaching argumentative synthesis writing through deliberative dialogues: instructional practices in secondary education

نویسندگان

چکیده

Dialogical argumentation practice contributes positively to argumentative writing skills. Specifically, deliberative dialogues are effective in promoting argument and counterargument integration students' essays. However, the potential of dialogic activities may be increased if they combined with instructional practices. The primary objective this research is compare impact four intervention programs, aimed at improving synthesis from conflicting sources. programs resulted combination two components (Explicit Instruction through video modelling—EI, or a Procedural Guideline—G), while Deliberative Dialogues—DD—were constant element. We conducted pre-post quasi-experimental study which 186 Spanish third grade secondary school students (aged 14–15) participated. evaluated quality syntheses by examining level coverage (the total number arguments included synthesis) type frequency strategies used syntheses). results showed that effectiveness methods varies according indicator. Explicit instruction, dialogues, was especially helpful syntheses. procedural guideline, contributed significantly arguments. these elements did not favor as expected, probably due conditions carried out. findings revealed processes different nature, follow learning paths require processes.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Teaching writing through reading:

The aim of this article is to establish the relevance of teaching reading and writing skills to students at Madrid Polytechnic University, and to show the relationship and interdependence of these activities in EAP courses. The skills involved in reading and writing processes for academic purposes for L2 students are compared and commented on from a rhetorical point of view. Learning tasks base...

متن کامل

An Argumentative Reasoning Service for Deliberative Agents

In this paper we propose a model that allows agents to deliberate using defeasible argumentation, to share knowledge with other agents, and to represent individual knowledge privately. We describe the design and implementation of a Defeasible Logic Programming Server that handles queries from several remote client agents. Queries will be answered using public knowledge stored in the Server and ...

متن کامل

Leadership Through Instructional Design in Higher Education

The function of leadership is to create a vision for the future, establish strategic priorities, and develop an environment of trust within and between organizations. Great leadership is a process; leadership involves motivational influence, leadership occurs in groups, and involves a shared vision (Northouse, 2010). Instructional designers are ideal leadership candidates for institutions of hi...

متن کامل

SHORT PAPER TEACHING WITH SCRATCH IN COMPULSORY SECONDARY EDUCATION Teaching with Scratch in Compulsory Secondary Education

The article analyzes the impact that the use of Scratch has in a group of students of Compulsory Secondary Education in the development of the teaching unit. For this we have studied the evolution of creative thought and analyzed the considerations made by the different actors involved, students and teachers. Qualitative and quantitative data are intended to complement the type of evidence and ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Instructional Science

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['0020-4277', '1573-1952']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09548-3